How low will liberals stoop?

[Limbo]

Here is a story from a British newspaper about a woman who aborted her child to "save the planet" by ensuring her carbon footprint would be kept to a minimum. (click here to read) (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=495495&in_page_id=1879)

Here is a quote from the story:


Incredibly, instead of mourning the loss of a family that never was, her boyfriend (now husband) presented her with a congratulations card.

While some might think it strange to celebrate the reversal of nature and denial of motherhood, Toni relishes her decision with an almost religious zeal.

"Having children is selfish. It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet," says Toni, 35.

...

While most parents view their children as the ultimate miracle of nature, Toni seems to see them as a sinister threat to the future.


Is this sick or what?

[MrJim]

Great find, Limbo, hadn't heard of this story

"Terrible mistake", eh... blechh...

Never have I heard of damage to the environment used as an excuse for abortion, but then again, some will go for any out they can find. I guess in this case a human being has been sacrificed out of the fear they may not drive a fuel-efficient car... how fucking disgusting!

[freakazoid]

If I had my way, they would be indited on murder charges. They are both sick killers.

Sadly, every thing she claims here is a complete absolute lie...

"Having children is selfish.

So lets all stop having children so we can rid the planet of human beings

It's all about maintaining your genetic line at the expense of the planet," says Toni, 35.

So, what is wrong with that? What is wrong with giving life to a new human being and a new generation?


"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."

Oh gee, we are so ashamed that we would dare use trees to build houses, some fossil fuels to keep warm or cool down, and that over population problem...who cares that it is absolute BULLSHIT, but that's no problem, idiot moron liberals rarely care about facts, so why start now?



This women is a sick ASSHOLE!

[MrJim]

If I had my way, they would be indited on murder charges. They are both sick killers.

I hear ya! :cool:

[England Expects]

I usually keep out of the abortion debate, and I'm not making any comment on it here BUT....

The Daily Mail is trash. I wont have it in the house.

If you read further down the column, all this happened 8 YEARS AGO!!

Theres a scoop for you. Up to date journalism at its best.

Over here, its nicknamed the Daily Heil. It famously supported the Nazi's before WW2 and wanted the UK to join Hitler.

[TheSpectacularSecularist]

"Every person who is born uses more food, more water, more land, more fossil fuels, more trees and produces more rubbish, more pollution, more greenhouse gases, and adds to the problem of over-population."

This is true, to an extent.

If we played our cards right, this planet can easily sustain all the animals plus 15-20 billion people without risking it at all.

But human beings suck at playing their cards right, and even if we did, we suck at living together without major conflicts, so the simplest answer to the problem would be not to have any children.

But we're fucked anyway, so fuck on. And reproduction is a natural right you can't take away from humans.

That's an other thing, I don't see this women trying to force her beliefs on others. What's wrong with it then? Except by the abortion part.

[Limbo]

I usually keep out of the abortion debate, and I'm not making any comment on it here BUT....

The Daily Mail is trash. I wont have it in the house.


They are giving direct quotes from the woman. Seems pretty factual to me.



If you read further down the column, all this happened 8 YEARS AGO!!

Theres a scoop for you. Up to date journalism at its best.


Who cares when it happened. She is boasting about how proud she is of the decision.



Over here, its nicknamed the Daily Heil. It famously supported the Nazi's before WW2 and wanted the UK to join Hitler.

Come now EE, what happened 8 years ago doesn't matter, but what some of the editors said almost 70 years ago (before the war started and before the world knew what Hitler was really all about) is somehow relevant to this story? Seems rather ad hominen to me.

Let's stick to the facts and forget the bullshit. She had an abortion because in her twisted mind, she thought it would help save the earth in an environmental sense. That's what is at issue here. We don't need any smokescreens to cover for this woman's sick actions.

[General Septem]

I'm just glad the bitch got her junk ripped out.

[England Expects]

It doesn't make sense to me that an environmentalist would have an abortion in a belief that she was saving the planet. Someone with such a keen interest would know that there are things you can do to limit the effect we have. If she really though there are too many humans, she should have just jumped unter a train or something.

If she wanted an abortion, its her right. She shouldn't have to justify it to anyone.

I wouldn't be surprised if she was on the payroll of the Daily Heil, and telling her story deliberately to provoke exactly the reaction that it has on here. I wouldn't even be surprised if it was totally fictitious.

You really should see the Mail. If you believed everything it publishes, you'd lock yourself in the house and never leave. It's so full of hateful bile against everyone and everything.