View Full Version : Why even make a post?
Brains_Behind_Operation
06-22-2006, 01:28 PM
Here's a suggestion for some of the idiots out there, if you have nothing to say just don't say anything! It's really been annoying me when people throw in posts that aren't passing any real message across or are saying something about a topic that isn't even closely related to the debate in the thread of the post. FYI - when someone asks a question to the general public and you step in and say "sorry, I don't know" that's just as bad as any. If you don't know we don't need you to tell us that!
Stop cluttering up this site and giving bullshit a bad name.
Nobody
06-23-2006, 01:44 AM
Here's a suggestion for some of the idiots out there, if you have nothing to say just don't say anything! It's really been annoying me when people throw in posts that aren't passing any real message across or are saying something about a topic that isn't even closely related to the debate in the thread of the post. FYI - when someone asks a question to the general public and you step in and say "sorry, I don't know" that's just as bad as any. If you don't know we don't need you to tell us that!
Stop cluttering up this site and giving bullshit a bad name.
Your going to have to get over it. If you can't, then do this; Drink to the point that when you lay in your bed, the ceiling spins. And then, you'll engage your foot brake,( by placing your foot on the floor), to keep the ceiling from spinning, only to realise, IT DOSEN'T WORK! So now you have to judge time and distance, in order to make it (sucsessfully), to the commode.............
Brains_Behind_Operation
06-23-2006, 09:20 AM
^--Point and case! Complete senseless babble!
Nobody
06-25-2006, 01:39 AM
^--Point and case! Complete senseless babble!
So you think you're the internet monitor? You really shouldnt cry about something that you've got the ability to change. If you don't like what you see, then go start up your own web site. But untill then, I think I'll stay, and be a thorn in your side
beelzebub
06-25-2006, 07:36 AM
So you think you're the internet monitor? You really shouldnt cry about something that you've got the ability to change. If you don't like what you see, then go start up your own web site. But untill then, I think I'll stay, and be a thorn in your side
Correct Nobody! BBO needs to learn that he cannot control others.
PLLLLEEEEAAAAASSSSEEE be a thorn in his side! PLEASE! I am holding you to your words. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
he he eehehehehhheehhhh eha hah hah hah YOUR SCREWED BBO! SCREWED!
Brains_Behind_Operation
06-25-2006, 10:25 AM
:p Go ahead and be a thorn, let's see just how much pain that you can cause me:p Show us all just how intelligent you can be:rolleyes:
Nobody
06-27-2006, 01:51 AM
:p Go ahead and be a thorn, let's see just how much pain that you can cause me:p Show us all just how intelligent you can be:rolleyes:
Hey retard! If you go back through your posts. You'll find where you tried to start a post, only to find ,no one replied to it, and you cried like a broke dick dog, only the day after it was posted. Are you a little pissbaby, that you can't wait for things to occur on a timely basis, or mommy has to change your diaper because you have shit running down your leg? Intelligents has nothing to do with it. Its a God Damned fact!
Brains_Behind_Operation
06-27-2006, 07:01 AM
That's right;) keep on reminding us all how much of a genius you are. Just make sure you get to bed a little earlier in the future, you're getting cranky:p
Nobody
06-29-2006, 08:44 PM
That's right;) keep on reminding us all how much of a genius you are. Just make sure you get to bed a little earlier in the future, you're getting cranky:p
LITTLE B.BOy... Is that the best you got? But what would you expect from a 17 tear old, unless YOU are only trying to impress your 12 year old girl friend...............You pediphile YOU!
hkdbadreligion
06-29-2006, 10:33 PM
What the hell are you talking about? Speaking of pediphiles... this 15 year old special-ed chick got pregnant by some college professor. Damn pervs.
Brains_Behind_Operation
06-30-2006, 12:29 AM
unless YOU are only trying to impress your 12 year old girl friend...
Twelve? :eek: Far too old...she's probably already began budding by then, and seen some hairs forming on her legs. I like to get 'em when they're still pure....9 at the oldest :rolleyes:
Nobody
06-30-2006, 01:36 AM
Twelve? :eek: Far too old...she's probably already began budding by then, and seen some hairs forming on her legs. I like to get 'em when they're still pure....9 at the oldest :rolleyes:
.Thats the best you 've got? What a FUCKING DICK! . Ohhhhh, I mean Pedophile.
tommygun
07-21-2006, 11:59 PM
hahahahahaha
General Septem
07-22-2006, 11:15 PM
Why do you even say anything?
I don't know... sorry.
beelzebub
07-23-2006, 09:29 PM
Twelve? :eek: Far too old...she's probably already began budding by then, and seen some hairs forming on her legs. I like to get 'em when they're still pure....9 at the oldest :rolleyes:
Whoa...... that’s going too far even for reverse psychology. Remember BBQ this is a forum posted all over the internet (world). Try to be a bit reserved.
Brains_Behind_Operation
07-25-2006, 01:52 AM
Whoa...... that’s going too far even for reverse psychology. Remember BBQ this is a forum posted all over the internet (world). Try to be a bit reserved.
Why? Who is a bit of sarcasm going to hurt? Why is the idea of people being sexually interested in children, (if they only are interested and don't act on their interests), so taboo? We accept that some people are sexually interested in those of the same sex, AND that they act on those interests. How could the former example be so much more repulsive? I honestly think that it is less of an obomination.
Paisleyspeaker
07-25-2006, 07:50 AM
If you think that wanting to have sex with someone who isn't sexual is less of an abomination than sex with an adult of the same sex, let me be the first to suggest therapy. Every "innocent" thought desensatizes you to the next. You don't have to have sex with a child to do harm to them. To use them in anyway for your own gratification is to violate their trust, a trust upon which everything is built.
And for the record, everyone who has gotten off either watching or fantasizing about two women together should stop talking about homosexuality as an abomination, unless it involves two penises you seem to like it just fine.
General Septem
07-25-2006, 08:43 AM
And for the record, everyone who has gotten off either watching or fantasizing about two women together should stop talking about homosexuality as an abomination, unless it involves two penises you seem to like it just fine.
That's kind of arbitrary of you to say that, because a porn addict saying fornication/lesbian sex/porn is wrong is like a smoker saying cigarettes are bad. Nobody ever questioned a smoker who said that by saying "you seem to like it just fine".
Paisleyspeaker
07-25-2006, 10:27 AM
Are you calling me a porn addict? Everyone has diffrent things that float their boat, and by far not all people who watch porn are addicted to it, that is a special subcatagory with carpel tunnel syndrome. What I was refering to was the hypocrasy. I am sure some of the gentlemen who will rail against homosexuality find the thought of two women arousing (Freaky?). They will make blanket negative statements and then make exceptions.
Brains_Behind_Operation
07-25-2006, 11:28 AM
If you think that wanting to have sex with someone who isn't sexual is less of an abomination than sex with an adult of the same sex, let me be the first to suggest therapy.
So tell me, how does the WANT to do this hurt the child or violate its trust in any way?
Paisleyspeaker
07-25-2006, 02:42 PM
So you belive that a person can want something and never try to get it? Never act on it at all? Like I tried to say earlier, that want will become fantasy, which is likely to become action. If you are wanting something so taboo, then the taboo is lessened for you, how long until there is nothing but lack of opportunity keeping you from acting?
beelzebub
07-25-2006, 08:22 PM
Because a porn addict saying fornication/lesbian sex/porn is wrong is like a smoker saying cigarettes are bad. Nobody ever questioned a smoker who said that by saying "you seem to like it just fine".
This is yet another example of how you apply statements in the wrong context.
She is saying that srt8 men who fanaticize about 2 lesbians should not take a stance against homosexuality. This is because they align themselves with it when they fanaticize about it and make themselves hypocrites when they condemn it.
You start bringing in Porn Addicts? She didn't say shit about porn addicts. Stick with it! Its a different subject.
But on that subject:
So porn addicts who say homosexuality is bad are like nicotine addicts that say cigarettes are bad?
First of all every smoker of mild intellect has to know and admit that it bad (so no conflict there)
Second of all you are comparing PORN and Tobacco. They are different in that there are Homo and Hetero (as well as others) verities of Porn and there are verities of tobacco. Your example includes the varities of sex but do not do the same for the tobacco. - Poor logic
General Septem
07-25-2006, 10:27 PM
Your example includes the varities of sex but do not do the same for the tobacco. - Poor logic
I said:
"because a porn addict saying fornication/lesbian sex/porn is wrong is like a smoker..."
Some porn addicts might tell you fornication is wrong. Some might tell you lesbian sex is wrong. Some might tell you porn is wrong. Some might tell you all three. And all three of these basically cover it, and in fact overlap, and there are others as well. Just because they watch porn doesn't discredit their assertions that watching porn is bad, because in their position, they have no choice but to watch it.
I wasn't even talking about people who watch porn out of full consent. In that case they'd be hypocrites.
General Septem
07-25-2006, 10:34 PM
Are you calling me a porn addict? Everyone has diffrent things that float their boat, and by far not all people who watch porn are addicted to it, that is a special subcatagory with carpel tunnel syndrome. What I was refering to was the hypocrasy. I am sure some of the gentlemen who will rail against homosexuality find the thought of two women arousing (Freaky?). They will make blanket negative statements and then make exceptions.
Arousal is one of those involuntary things. It's hypocritical if they willfully indulge in that.
Porn addiction can happen. In fact I'd guess it's very likely - most people just don't notice because they've never tried to quit.
beelzebub
07-25-2006, 11:51 PM
Don’t edit this is what you said:
because a porn addict saying fornication/lesbian sex/porn is wrong is like a smoker saying cigarettes are bad. .
You are giving qualities to the topic of sex and unifying all of smoking. Sex has many different aspects as do cigarette.
There are different types of smoking:
Cigarette, Cigar, Pipe, Light, 100's, Menthol and on and on.
You should refine your example to say something like "Pipe Smokers who say that cigarette smokers are bad."
That’s what I meant!
General Septem
07-25-2006, 11:55 PM
You should refine your example to say something like "Pipe Smokers who say that cigarette smokers are bad."
That’s what I meant!
Now that was clear. Now if you'd do this more often rather than just get pissed and call me an ignorant ass, we might get somewhere.
My example: Cigarette smokers who say smoking cigarettes is bad. They know it's bad, probably more than a non-smoker, yet they don't have a choice. My point is that it would be wrong to dismiss their assertions as hypocritical simply because they smoke cigarettes themselves.
beelzebub
07-26-2006, 05:44 AM
Now that was clear. Now if you'd do this more often rather than just get pissed and call me an ignorant ass, we might get somewhere.
GS it is not my job to teach you how to debate or how to form logic.
Sorry about the ignorant and stupid and all the other names I call you. I just get irritated with you.
General Septem
07-26-2006, 08:33 AM
GS it is not my job to teach you how to debate or how to form logic.
No, but when we are debating it's always better to ask for clarification before you just assume I'm an idiot.
Brains_Behind_Operation
07-26-2006, 11:24 PM
So you belive that a person can want something and never try to get it? Never act on it at all? Like I tried to say earlier, that want will become fantasy, which is likely to become action. If you are wanting something so taboo, then the taboo is lessened for you, how long until there is nothing but lack of opportunity keeping you from acting?
I really disagree. Anyone can refrain from doing something that they want to, but know is wrong. It just takes some self control. My mother was an avid smoker until she became pregnant with myself and my brother. Immediately when she realized she was pregnant, she quit smoking and has never smoked since. She still to this day tells me that she has had dreams of smoking, and that she feels a craving for a cigarrette every once in a while. She has had many, MANY opportunities to act as well. One example is when she goes to her bridge club, there are women who smoke while playing the game and offer her a cigarrette as well. She has yet to take them up on the offer.
A person's preferences cannot be inherently evil because a person has no control over their preferences. It can only be a problem if they take action on their preferences, and this is something that does not happen if a person knows that it is wrong and avoids it. It is no more wrong to be sexually attracted to children than it is to be sexually attracted to people of the same gender or to want to take your clothes off in the middle of school and run up and down the hallways.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.