PDA

View Full Version : UN - Barbarians at the gate



dancer
09-21-2006, 06:28 PM
It has become a play ground for those third world tyrants who do not know how to behave in a civilized world.

REPTILE
09-22-2006, 11:01 PM
Also a playground for the 1st world country tyrants who are just as greedy and careless as the guy sitting next to them

England Expects
09-27-2006, 10:07 AM
The UN was set up so that we can never has "tyrants" imposing their will on others.

When is it going to bomb Washington?

assholius
09-27-2006, 05:05 PM
When is it going to bomb Washington?
Reply With Quote


It's never going to bomb anyone,that's why it's practically irrelavent to Iran,North korea,and Bush.

General Septem
09-27-2006, 05:23 PM
The UN was set up so that we can never has "tyrants" imposing their will on others.

When is it going to bomb Washington?
The UN are the tyrants. They're all conspiring together, people.

REPTILE
09-27-2006, 09:59 PM
Governments dont care about their citizens, dont believe all their bullshit. The Illuminati/Global Elite/New World Order (Whatever you wanna call it) is conspiring against us on a global scale.

England Expects
09-28-2006, 02:22 AM
The US has a history of aggression against anyone who doesn't share their point of view.

The current world conflicts were engineered because Bush and his family stand to profit financially from the business it provides for the carlysle group defense company.

The same went for WWII. Your country didnt get involved until so late because it was making too much money arming Hitler with bombs that he would drop on the British.

World peace will only ever be achieved through diplomacy and the UN. The world is so bored with th US, they just don't listen anymore.

death2chikins
11-08-2006, 10:47 AM
The US has a history of aggression against anyone who doesn't share their point of view.

The current world conflicts were engineered because Bush and his family stand to profit financially from the business it provides for the carlysle group defense company.

The same went for WWII. Your country didnt get involved until so late because it was making too much money arming Hitler with bombs that he would drop on the British.

World peace will only ever be achieved through diplomacy and the UN. The world is so bored with th US, they just don't listen anymore.

First: We had no reason to get involved in WW 2 before Pearl Harbor. It wasn't till then that the US was attacked.

Second: WW 2 was started by Europe own arrogance and lack of forsight. It was your mess why should we have gotten involved.

Third: We didn't arm Hitler. We help arm Britian. If it was not for the aid comeing from the US England may very well have fallen to the Germans.

Fourth: Before any European country points it's figure at the US and blames us for Historical acts of aggression You should take a good long hard look at your own history.

Brains_Behind_Operation
11-10-2006, 09:31 AM
^^-- Fifth: Pearl Harbor happened BECAUSE we were arming the enemies of the Axis (Nazis and Japs etc.)

Sixth: It was the involvement of the US that brought upon D-Day and finally finished the war.

death2chikins
11-10-2006, 09:51 AM
Today the US is in a lose-lose position if we do stay out of someone else's mess we get blasted for not doing enough for world peace when we do get envolved we get blasted for imposing american ideas. I wish the world would make up it's mind do you want our help or not. If not then i am sure we will be more than happy to leave you to the wolves again. If you do then please stop complaining about how we do it. Although there is a third option you could do it instead of us. That I would love to see.

England Expects
11-23-2006, 10:00 AM
"Today the US is in a lose-lose position if we do stay out of someone else's mess we get blasted for not doing enough for world peace when we do get envolved we get blasted for imposing american ideas."

This is partly true. If you intervened on humanitarian grounds rather than where you could make the most money maybe the world would be on side.

"Although there is a third option you could do it instead of us. That I would love to see."

How would that apply to me? We're shoulder to shoulder and up to our necks in shit just the same as you!

BBO and death2chikins, most of what you've written is pure bullshit. Point by point I'll show you why.

"First: We had no reason to get involved in WW 2 before Pearl Harbor. It wasn't till then that the US was attacked."

Not really true. The US economy at the time was struggling and you couldn't afford a war. You dug yourself out of the depression by selling arms to both sides of the conflict, and only intervened when it became unavoidable.

"Second: WW 2 was started by Europe own arrogance and lack of forsight. It was your mess why should we have gotten involved."

It was started by a homicidal megalomaniac who would have been a threat to the US if he'd taken the UK. How you can turn your backs while millions of people are being slaughtered and then claim it's there own fault for being arrogant is beyond me.

"Third: We didn't arm Hitler. We help arm Britian. If it was not for the aid comeing from the US England may very well have fallen to the Germans."

Again, not true. If you hadn't been supplying the Nazi's, maybe they wouldn't have been a threat to the UK

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html

"Fourth: Before any European country points it's figure at the US and blames us for Historical acts of aggression You should take a good long hard look at your own history."

We have. I'd be nice if you could learn from our (and your own) mistakes.

"Fifth: Pearl Harbor happened BECAUSE we were arming the enemies of the Axis (Nazis and Japs etc.)"

Possibly. You were arming everybody. War is a profittable business.

"Sixth: It was the involvement of the US that brought upon D-Day and finally finished the war."

Now this is the biggest bullshitting lie of all.

I know you yanks like to think that you came in, killed a load of Nazi's and saved everyone but its not quite true.

The D-Day landings were made by the US, the UK and Canada. They were only possible because Hitler had diverted forces from the Western front to an all out assault on the Soviets. The SS got their asses kicked and Stalins men pegged them back and took Berlin while we (UK and US) kept him busy in the west.

Roosevelt knew that if he wasn't involved in Western Europe, Stalin would have easily replaced the Nazi's and the whole of Europe would probably have been part of the Soviet Union.

There ends the history lesson.

Ausinus
12-06-2006, 06:57 AM
In terms of foreign relations, i agree. The UN is ending up like its predecessor, the League of Nations.

Part of the problem stems from the power the security council wields compared to the general assembly.

Just a though;)