Clinton Smackdown [Archive] - Bullshit.com Forums

beelzebub

09-24-2006, 09:39 PM

dancer

09-25-2006, 06:00 PM

Hell yeah!!!!

Chris Wallace tried to "put a conservative hit" out on Clinton and it backfired!
Clinton opend a can of WHOOP ASS! I love it.:D

CLICK HERE (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,215445,00.html)

Chris asked the questions any reporters would have asked regardless of who the guests are. Clinton must have some subconscious guilt of not doing the job in order for him to react the way he did.

I say it was pretty pathetic !

beelzebub

09-26-2006, 05:46 PM

Chris asked the questions any reporters would have asked regardless of who the guests are.

WTF? You are obviously slanted or didn't watch! The way that ass framed the question was opinioned and rude. "Why didn't you do more....." Implies he didn't do enough.... which is bullshit and he told him so!

Clinton must have some subconscious guilt of not doing the job in order for him to react the way he did. I say it was pretty pathetic !

No he is leading the push-over democrats to stand firm against the conniving, word twisting, arrogant and myopic conservative republicans!

What I think is pathetic is the so called “unbiased opinion” that fox tries to pretend it has and the stupid people who believe them.

MORE POWER TO HIM

General Septem

09-26-2006, 06:16 PM

WTF? You are obviously slanted or didn't watch! The way that ass framed the question was opinioned and rude. "Why didn't you do more....." Implies he didn't do enough.... which is bullshit and he told him so!
It may have been a loaded question, but also keep in mind it wasn't his question. More than likely he was told to ask it. Clinton made a point, but he also sounded a lot like a crybaby. Perhaps the reporter didn't like Clinton, and if that's the case he was out of line, but I think Clinton took it a bit too personally. Perhaps Clinton was right, but his response did sound rather immature and showed weakness. Just my opinion though; I don't really have an opinion about Clinton.

beelzebub

09-26-2006, 08:31 PM

It may have been a loaded question, but also keep in mind it wasn't his question. More than likely he was told to ask it.

I understand that but... he is on the show. That interviewer, by virtue of his job, took the position of his superiors. Therefore; he takes the consequences of his actions. If he dosen't agree - he should QUIT!

Should have Clinton placated their assault? Should he affront their stance and let them know where he stands? I felt he looked very forceful and very assured of his position. More importantly what he said reflects actual accounts.

Clinton made a point, but he also sounded a lot like a crybaby.

Hell!!! I didn’t see that AT ALL! I was impressed with his tactics and his forcefulness. I thought that he maintained his composure under the circumstances. He didn't whine or complain. He was succinct with a legitimate but inappropriate question. Why is it "crybaby" to respond forcefully to a question that challenges your actions when you feel that you did everything you could with the resistance of people around you?

Perhaps the reporter didn't like Clinton, and if that's the case he was out of line,

He and FOX have a history of Clinton Bashing.

but I think Clinton took it a bit too personally. Perhaps Clinton was right, but his response did sound rather immature and showed weakness.

I don’t think so. He is a very calculated person. The Democratic Party has a current reputation of being "soft and weak". I believe that he was showing how strong and direct we can be.

I AM PROUD OF BILL CLINTON!

General Septem

09-27-2006, 08:37 AM

Perhaps you're right, but it's just the impression I got from watching it. I would've handled myself differently but that doens't make doing otherwise right or wrong. In all fairness, some of what Clinton said made me respect him a bit more.

beelzebub

09-27-2006, 10:06 PM

freakazoid

10-09-2006, 12:03 AM

I understand that but... he is on the show. That interviewer, by virtue of his job, took the position of his superiors. Therefore; he takes the consequences of his actions. If he dosen't agree - he should QUIT!

Should have Clinton placated their assault? Should he affront their stance and let them know where he stands? I felt he looked very forceful and very assured of his position. More importantly what he said reflects actual accounts.

Hell!!! I didn’t see that AT ALL! I was impressed with his tactics and his forcefulness. I thought that he maintained his composure under the circumstances. He didn't whine or complain. He was succinct with a legitimate but inappropriate question. Why is it "crybaby" to respond forcefully to a question that challenges your actions when you feel that you did everything you could with the resistance of people around you?

He and FOX have a history of Clinton Bashing.

I don’t think so. He is a very calculated person. The Democratic Party has a current reputation of being "soft and weak". I believe that he was showing how strong and direct we can be.

I AM PROUD OF BILL CLINTON!
Bullshit! You're just jealous on Monica Lewinsky! :D

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/5995/cha0008lvs4.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/2282/logojy1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

normlman

10-16-2006, 01:58 AM

[QUOTE=freakazoid]Bullshit! You're just jealous on Monica Lewinsky! :D

That durty girl could crawl up under my desk anytime she wanted, as many times as she wanted.
And if she's married nowaday's?
That's quite alright, I'm not the jealous type.

regards,
NORMLman

recp

10-23-2006, 09:42 AM

Yep....dat's rite....dey all are CROOKS!!!

death2chikins

10-23-2006, 11:05 AM

Yep....dat's rite....dey all are CROOKS!!!

I chouldn't agree more. The only difference between democratic and repubilcan is the name. They both have only the best interest of their respected parties at heart and not the interest of the country as a whole. As far as i can tell the only prez we ever had worth anything was good ole Teddy!!!!!!!

"SPEAK SOFTLY AND CARRY A BIG STICK AND YOU WILL GO FAR"