freakazoid
10-22-2006, 12:38 PM
:: Here is another set of videos showing the same kind of grey to dark black smoke, and you will notice that the intense fireball upon impact of the jets only lasts a few second (not long enough to damage the remaining steel structure to any degree at all)...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6119737782777533025&q=911+jumpers&hl=en
* And...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-480304891269991297&q=911+jumpers&hl=en
* Footnote; here is a comment I emailed to back to a person I sent these video links to who answered my email to him...
Hello Paul...
No, not a "bad guys in the United States did it conspiracy theorist," I'll
leave that to the nuts who believe Elvis is still alive...I do, however,
believe that the fire played a smaller part in bringing down the towers than
claimed. I believe it was a combination of several factors including the
initial damage done upon impact of the jets that tore into enough of the
structure as to weaken it and bring the towers down in concert with several other factors. True, one tower was hit more or less in the side of the building, but the combination of the fires, a large section of the structure being tore out and the weakening of the inside load bearing center structure all contributed to the towers coming down in my opinion.
Have a great day!
Freak :-)
PS, thanks for the other information, very interesting!
:: Here is his email to me (with some very interesting material in it)...
Freak - Interesting view of the Twin Towers. I can't get a hold on
which direction the camera was pointed. Seeing the wind was blowing
the smoke away from the viewfinder and the ocean was to the east I can
only guess that the view was to the west.
Check this pic out - You can see where the ferries were nosed up to the docks.
http://www.directionsmag.com/gisresponse/images/maps/nyc/airphotousa_twintowers.jpg
More here - http://www.directionsmag.com/gisresponse/maps-nyc.php -
Don't tell me you are one of the conspiracy theorists re: 9/11 - The
steel would not have to melt but only be weakened. - Check out Popular
mechanics website re: this. - Here is a link for one of their pages.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4
Note this is page four - Change the number at the end of the url and you can get page 1, 2, 3, etc... up to nine...
I read this in their magazine when it came out. I'd rather trust Popular Mechanics than Michael Moore.
As far as the controlled explosions theory wouldn't it take quite a
few people in on it to pull it off. In fact all the conspiracy
theories taken together would have to have hundreds of people "in the
know" and be doing something 99% of Americans would find
reprehensible.
Unless Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld did all the work themselves under
cover of darkness.
P.S. Just a note re: the 99% given above. Did you know that 89% of all
statistics are made up on the spot?
GBYAY - Paul -
P.S. Terrorists did it not the U.S. "gumermint"...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6119737782777533025&q=911+jumpers&hl=en
* And...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-480304891269991297&q=911+jumpers&hl=en
* Footnote; here is a comment I emailed to back to a person I sent these video links to who answered my email to him...
Hello Paul...
No, not a "bad guys in the United States did it conspiracy theorist," I'll
leave that to the nuts who believe Elvis is still alive...I do, however,
believe that the fire played a smaller part in bringing down the towers than
claimed. I believe it was a combination of several factors including the
initial damage done upon impact of the jets that tore into enough of the
structure as to weaken it and bring the towers down in concert with several other factors. True, one tower was hit more or less in the side of the building, but the combination of the fires, a large section of the structure being tore out and the weakening of the inside load bearing center structure all contributed to the towers coming down in my opinion.
Have a great day!
Freak :-)
PS, thanks for the other information, very interesting!
:: Here is his email to me (with some very interesting material in it)...
Freak - Interesting view of the Twin Towers. I can't get a hold on
which direction the camera was pointed. Seeing the wind was blowing
the smoke away from the viewfinder and the ocean was to the east I can
only guess that the view was to the west.
Check this pic out - You can see where the ferries were nosed up to the docks.
http://www.directionsmag.com/gisresponse/images/maps/nyc/airphotousa_twintowers.jpg
More here - http://www.directionsmag.com/gisresponse/maps-nyc.php -
Don't tell me you are one of the conspiracy theorists re: 9/11 - The
steel would not have to melt but only be weakened. - Check out Popular
mechanics website re: this. - Here is a link for one of their pages.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=4
Note this is page four - Change the number at the end of the url and you can get page 1, 2, 3, etc... up to nine...
I read this in their magazine when it came out. I'd rather trust Popular Mechanics than Michael Moore.
As far as the controlled explosions theory wouldn't it take quite a
few people in on it to pull it off. In fact all the conspiracy
theories taken together would have to have hundreds of people "in the
know" and be doing something 99% of Americans would find
reprehensible.
Unless Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld did all the work themselves under
cover of darkness.
P.S. Just a note re: the 99% given above. Did you know that 89% of all
statistics are made up on the spot?
GBYAY - Paul -
P.S. Terrorists did it not the U.S. "gumermint"...