hitekredneck
07-26-2009, 10:15 AM
ok, i'm really getting tired of the whole ban/don't ban promo, freak vs promo, rise vs promo etc et al...
i want to make something perfectly clear...i was the one to ban him...i banned him for making multiple accounts for the sole purpose of trolling, mainly to piss me off, which, i fully admit it worked...had he been my neighbor, i'ld been at his house stomping a mudhole in his ass...did i go too far?...probably...i'm not proud of losing my temper at any time, much less over a bunch of characters typed on a puter screen, but it happened...promo was not banned for the c/p crap he insistently posts, nor the ad-hominem attacks on all of those he disagrees with, which is most of the members...does he ever make a valid point?...i figger eventually he will, and he has added an idea or two that i found unusually (for him) intelligent and coherent...should he have been unbanned?...shit, i don't know nor do i care, as it wasn't my decision to make...i do know that since he's been reinstated, the vitriol factor has multiplied by ten, and a few members have seemed to have disappeared, tho the timing may be simple coincidence...
i guess my point is this:
if you don't like what he has to say, ignore his posting or dispute it...if you have a problem with him or what he has to say, take it up with him and not paisley...they're married, not the same person...if he willingly breaks the rules, then contact GS or Haw, as they are now the mods...
/rant
i want to make something perfectly clear...i was the one to ban him...i banned him for making multiple accounts for the sole purpose of trolling, mainly to piss me off, which, i fully admit it worked...had he been my neighbor, i'ld been at his house stomping a mudhole in his ass...did i go too far?...probably...i'm not proud of losing my temper at any time, much less over a bunch of characters typed on a puter screen, but it happened...promo was not banned for the c/p crap he insistently posts, nor the ad-hominem attacks on all of those he disagrees with, which is most of the members...does he ever make a valid point?...i figger eventually he will, and he has added an idea or two that i found unusually (for him) intelligent and coherent...should he have been unbanned?...shit, i don't know nor do i care, as it wasn't my decision to make...i do know that since he's been reinstated, the vitriol factor has multiplied by ten, and a few members have seemed to have disappeared, tho the timing may be simple coincidence...
i guess my point is this:
if you don't like what he has to say, ignore his posting or dispute it...if you have a problem with him or what he has to say, take it up with him and not paisley...they're married, not the same person...if he willingly breaks the rules, then contact GS or Haw, as they are now the mods...
/rant