The Greatest Philosophical Question Ever Devised

[thememan]

Alright, let's imagine you have a cloner. Now then, you clone yourself, only your clone is the sex of that you are sexually attracted to(For instance, if you are Hetero Male, you have a Hetero Female clone, if you are Homo male, you have a Homo Male clone, same for female, etc).

Now then, your clone is very sexually attractive. It does not matter what YOU look like, however your clone is amazingly attractive regardless.

Now, let's say you have sex with said clone.

Here's the great question:

Is it:

A)Consentual Sex
B)Incest
C)Masturbation

So, I ask of the greatest minds ever to be in interweb land, which is it?

[who897]

Alright, let's imagine you have a cloner. Now then, you clone yourself, only your clone is the sex of that you are sexually attracted to(For instance, if you are Hetero Male, you have a Hetero Female clone, if you are Homo male, you have a Homo Male clone, same for female, etc).

Now then, your clone is very sexually attractive. It does not matter what YOU look like, however your clone is amazingly attractive regardless.

Now, let's say you have sex with said clone.

Here's the great question:

Is it:

A)Consentual Sex
B)Incest
C)Masturbation

So, I ask of the greatest minds ever to be in interweb land, which is it?

I'll take "C" for one thousand Alex. But I'd call it Mutual Masturbation.

[freakazoid]

Alright, let's imagine you have a cloner. Now then, you clone yourself, only your clone is the sex of that you are sexually attracted to(For instance, if you are Hetero Male, you have a Hetero Female clone, if you are Homo male, you have a Homo Male clone, same for female, etc).

Now then, your clone is very sexually attractive. It does not matter what YOU look like, however your clone is amazingly attractive regardless.

Now, let's say you have sex with said clone.

Here's the great question:

Is it:

A)Consentual Sex
B)Incest
C)Masturbation

So, I ask of the greatest minds ever to be in interweb land, which is it?
A circle jerk?

LOL, sorry, my bad! :D

[twisted_screams]

:p
only a guy would come up with that
anyway i pick insest cause wouldn't it be like having sex with a relative
shivers its sooooooooo ewee

[Ausinus]

I would pick twincest.:D

[thememan]

:p
only a guy would come up with that
anyway i pick insest cause wouldn't it be like having sex with a relative
shivers its sooooooooo ewee

Come now, this discussion arose with some females as well, however they couldn't get past the "EW! That's so disgusting!" bit. Sometimes philosophy means thinking about things you rather wouldn't.

Ah, however, it is TECHNICALLY you. Same genetics, same coding, just you. The difference is is that even relatives have SLIGHTLY different coding(There even a few minute differences in twins), however this clone is for all intensive purposes you.

:D *Plans on making millions with my new cloning device, and selling it to people with this sort of fetish*

Mwa.

[Brains_Behind_Operation]

However it needs to have some different genes just to be a woman....in my case ALOT of different genes to be an ATTRACTIVE woman. So, simply by you showing that Identical Twins have different genes, these must be two different people.

Even if we can assume that they have identical DNA they are still two different people. Think of it like 2 identical computers. They are for all instances the same until they start getting used. Once either one is used for the first time it is in someway different from the other and always will be. The same with an identical human, once it has its first experience it is different from you.

Therefor, INCEST. Of course, who doesn't have an attractive cousin with whom the idea hasn't passed through their mind?:D

[Ausinus]

I know a few people who would try to do themselves if they could.:D

[General Septem]

Even if the DNA were identical with the exception of the X/Y chromosomes, those chromosome differences would make them a different person, so that rules out masturbation.

Unless you found some way to speed up the aging process, it'd be statutory rape for the first 16-18 years after the cloning. Assuming your clone is the samge age as you, however, I'm going to say it's incest, for the same reason brother/sister relations is incest; the genetic defficiencies would be multiplied in their offspring.

[yea_thats_right1]

you guys are weird lol...

[thememan]

Therefor, INCEST. Of course, who doesn't have an attractive cousin with whom the idea hasn't passed through their mind?:D

Er... you go to family reunions to pick up women, don't you?

@Ausinus-I know I would. I'd be one sexy lady.

@General-You are putting a great deal of thought and effort into this. Good form! And yes, we're assuming your clone would be your age.

@yea-that's-right: Yes. Just notice?

[Ausinus]

Oh bugger you

[who897]

Since it's techincally you.....that would rule out the illegal part of it since you can make such dissions for yourself. The question is, could you have sex w/ yourself at a really young age.

[General Septem]

No, the real question is thus:

If you clone your wife a few times, is your relationship still monogamous? :D

[who897]

No, the real question is thus:

If you clone your wife a few times, is your relationship still monogamous? :D

Then in retort, why the fuck would anyone want to clone their wife? Don't you think having one wife is punishment enough :D

[Ausinus]

Ok, it would be polygamy, because you have more than one of a spouse. Doesnt matter who it is.

[General Septem]

Ok, it would be polygamy, because you have more than one of a spouse. Doesnt matter who it is.
But that's the thing, they'd all be the same "who". So who it is would refer to all of them. :D

[who897]

But that's the thing, they'd all be the same "who". So who it is would refer to all of them. :D

In the USA we have this thing called no cruel and unusual punishment, I think more then one wife falls under that.

[General Septem]

In the USA we have this thing called no cruel and unusual punishment, I think more then one wife falls under that.

Yes, but if you had four, they'd be too busy fighting amongst themselves to argue with you. :D

[thememan]

Yes, but if you had four, they'd be too busy fighting amongst themselves to argue with you. :D

Or they could bind together into one Super-Wives forces, and completely destroy you and emasculate you twenty four hours a day.

One woman can only do that about 12 hours a day, this way they can go in ever-other-day shift.

[General Septem]

Or they could bind together into one Super-Wives forces, and completely destroy you and emasculate you twenty four hours a day.

One woman can only do that about 12 hours a day, this way they can go in ever-other-day shift.

On the other hand, three of them could have headaches and you could still get sex. And you wouldn't have to worry about them being worn out because they could switch off after a few hours. :D

[who897]

On the other hand, three of them could have headaches and you could still get sex. And you wouldn't have to worry about them being worn out because they could switch off after a few hours. :D

Nope, and I'll prove that. Ever notice when you put groups of women together for long amount of time, their menstal cycles begin to start and end at the same time. It's phenomonem I like to call "Bloody Sunday Syndrom" Or BS'S. Which stands to reason, if they are together for long periods of time, they will develop that "headache" just around the same time.

[thememan]

On the other hand, three of them could have headaches and you could still get sex. And you wouldn't have to worry about them being worn out because they could switch off after a few hours. :D

That is just a lie. Women only use that excuse when they don't want to have sex.

Think about it. If you(I'm assuming you are male) have a headache, would you pass up sex? No. Thus, do to quantum inverse relations and the extrapolating panda theorum, neither would women, in conjunction.

I can sound scientific too, gosh durn it!

[Ausinus]

If you see kay.
Tell him you may
See you in tea,
Tell him from me.

If you dont get it, read the first and third lines out loud.

:D

[who897]

If you see kay.
Tell him you may
See you in tea,
Tell him from me.

:D

If you see susan
Tell her it's amusing
She's been accusing
Bitch shouldn't be refusing.

[Ausinus]

W.t.f.mate?

[who897]

W.t.f.mate?

Don't question yourself on the unimportant. Focus on the future, it is the only thing that matters.

[Ausinus]

Im assuming thats a joke.:D

[who897]

Im assuming thats a joke.:D

You assume correctly young one.

[General Septem]

That is just a lie. Women only use that excuse when they don't want to have sex.

Think about it. If you(I'm assuming you are male) have a headache, would you pass up sex? No. Thus, do to quantum inverse relations and the extrapolating panda theorum, neither would women, in conjunction.

I can sound scientific too, gosh durn it!

Well, I'm being facetious, and assuming that out of the three with headaches, maybe once a year one of them actually would. :D

[MrBirdy]

Consentual masturbation with a little incest...

I bet it would be fun, and since the bible NEVER mentions clones, it would be god, and the govt. dont mention no clones neither

[who897]

If you see kay.
Tell him you may
See you in tea,
Tell him from me.

If you dont get it, read the first and third lines out loud.

:D

Took me a while, don't know what that other filler stuff is for though.

[twisted_screams]

Come now, this discussion arose with some females as well, however they couldn't get past the "EW! That's so disgusting!" bit. Sometimes philosophy means thinking about things you rather wouldn't.

Ah, however, it is TECHNICALLY you. Same genetics, same coding, just you. The difference is is that even relatives have SLIGHTLY different coding(There even a few minute differences in twins), however this clone is for all intensive purposes you.

:D *Plans on making millions with my new cloning device, and selling it to people with this sort of fetish*

Mwa.
Grins wickedly yeah i can see the Clone fetish making millions just when you make the clones please make them with an on off switch for me please

[Nobody]

I bet it would be fun, and since the bible NEVER mentions clones, it would be god, and the govt. dont mention no clones neither
....Yes it does. The bible just doesn't use the word "clone"

[General Septem]

Grins wickedly yeah i can see the Clone fetish making millions just when you make the clones please make them with an on off switch for me please

You mean an on/off switch, or like an ON on/off switch? :D

[theicidal maniac]

Alright, let's imagine you have a cloner. Now then, you clone yourself, only your clone is the sex of that you are sexually attracted to(For instance, if you are Hetero Male, you have a Hetero Female clone, if you are Homo male, you have a Homo Male clone, same for female, etc).

Now then, your clone is very sexually attractive. It does not matter what YOU look like, however your clone is amazingly attractive regardless.

Now, let's say you have sex with said clone.

Here's the great question:

Is it:

A)Consentual Sex
B)Incest
C)Masturbation

So, I ask of the greatest minds ever to be in interweb land, which is it?

Masturbation literally means "to defile one's self"...so I guess the answer depends on what exactly you do to your clone and how dirty it gets. Otherwise, it's consentual incest, which kind of takes all of the fun out of incest, ya know

[nouseforaname]

wish you were here

[who897]

wish you were here

Umm Pink Flyod or Incubus...I forget.

[General Septem]

Umm Pink Flyod or Incubus...I forget.

Yes, Pink Floyd. :D

[Paisleyspeaker]

Gee , um ,well

To beat a dead horse, it would be incest, opposite sex is not you, so not masterbation. And for something condemed in the bible it seems that everyone was doing it. Incest that is.
And for cloning many wives, they would not all be the same personas their expierences would begin to shape them into diffrent people as soon as they became aware. I beleive polygamist men to be masochists anyway. The ones that aren't overblown, chest thumping child molesters anyway. If you marry children then browbeat them into being what you want you suck, if you take on more then one adult women and the dynamics between them you must enjoy pain.:cool:

[General Septem]

Gee , um ,well

To beat a dead horse, it would be incest, opposite sex is not you, so not masterbation. And for something condemed in the bible it seems that everyone was doing it. Incest that is.
And for cloning many wives, they would not all be the same personas their expierences would begin to shape them into diffrent people as soon as they became aware. I beleive polygamist men to be masochists anyway. The ones that aren't overblown, chest thumping child molesters anyway. If you marry children then browbeat them into being what you want you suck, if you take on more then one adult women and the dynamics between them you must enjoy pain.:cool:

You're back! :D *hugs*

[TheAvenger]

D. All of the above?



:confused: