Cities over 3 billion!

[something]

And what do you guys think about this?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4561183.stm

The cities grows faster than architechs can plan them, this is a real problem if you ask me, but if they did catch up with them, I would think it's great.

[General Septem]

I'll never live in a big building that someone can bomb and kill thousands of people. Besides, I hate the big city mentalities. I'll bet the president has wet dreams about complete urbanization though.

[freakazoid]

I'll never live in a big building that someone can bomb and kill thousands of people. Besides, I hate the big city mentalities. I'll bet the president has wet dreams about complete urbanization though.

Nothing like living in a concrete jungle! http://forum.bullshit.com/images/icons/icon13.gif SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!

[something]

I'll never live in a big building that someone can bomb and kill thousands of people. Besides, I hate the big city mentalities. I'll bet the president has wet dreams about complete urbanization though.

But what if they can make theese buildings completely safe then, or atleast so they not can get destryed because of a bomb?:o

[General Septem]

But what if they can make theese buildings completely safe then, or atleast so they not can get destryed because of a bomb?:o

You mean kind of like how the WTC towers couldn't be brought down by planes?

[something]

You mean kind of like how the WTC towers couldn't be brought down by planes?

Kind of, but who actually works.

[General Septem]

Kind of, but who actually works.

Oh, more like the unsinkable Titanic then. :D

[something]

Oh, more like the unsinkable Titanic then. :D

Lol:D , yeah I know, nothing that is completely safe has ever been completely safe, but atleast safe enough?

[General Septem]

Lol:D , yeah I know, nothing that is completely safe has ever been completely safe, but atleast safe enough?

Problem is, the terrorists (read: tyrannical government) generally target big buildings with lots of people, not houses with anywhere from 1-4 people that may or may not be home at the time and whom nobody cares about. If the government wants something destroyed, it's gone, no matter how reinforced it is. So the only way to really be safe is to not be a target.

[something]

Problem is, the terrorists (read: tyrannical government) generally target big buildings with lots of people, not houses with anywhere from 1-4 people that may or may not be home at the time and whom nobody cares about. If the government wants something destroyed, it's gone, no matter how reinforced it is. So the only way to really be safe is to not be a target.

True, very true, and BTW have you ever heard of Dubai? It's the richest country in the middle east, and they are planing to build the highest building in the world. First they planed to made it 590 meters (Lets see, that'll be around 1900 feets) but there's rumors that say that it's going to be 900 meters (Um, that's 2700 feets), so I wonder what kind of terrorists that will attack that building:D

[who897]

Actually they can make something bomb proof...they just gotta build it where the bombs don't blow it up.

[General Septem]

Actually they can make something bomb proof...they just gotta build it where the bombs don't blow it up.

Well at the moment we can blow up something underground, and we can blow up satellites in orbit (well China can). And obviously we can blow up something above ground. Do you have any other ideas? :D

[hitekredneck]

True, very true, and BTW have you ever heard of Dubai? It's the richest country in the middle east, and they are planing to build the highest building in the world. First they planed to made it 590 meters (Lets see, that'll be around 1900 feets) but there's rumors that say that it's going to be 900 meters (Um, that's 2700 feets), so I wonder what kind of terrorists that will attack that building:D

they might as well add a big fuckin target to the roof!!:D

[who897]

Well at the moment we can blow up something underground, and we can blow up satellites in orbit (well China can). And obviously we can blow up something above ground. Do you have any other ideas? :D

Sure do, don't put your house where the bombs blow up. It's still the same idea. If your home is built somewhere and a bomb blows it up, then it is not bomb proof. If you build your home where the bomb doesn't blow up then your home is bomb proof.

[something]

Sure do, don't put your house where the bombs blow up. It's still the same idea. If your home is built somewhere and a bomb blows it up, then it is not bomb proof. If you build your home where the bomb doesn't blow up then your home is bomb proof.

True. The problem is knowing where the bomb's blowing up

[who897]

True. The problem is knowing where the bomb's blowing up

Alas, that is not my problem.

[something]

Alas, that is not my problem.

No, so the best thing would be that just get away with the one that might bomb the houses in the first place:D

[General Septem]

Sure do, don't put your house where the bombs blow up. It's still the same idea. If your home is built somewhere and a bomb blows it up, then it is not bomb proof. If you build your home where the bomb doesn't blow up then your home is bomb proof.

I guess the answer is submitting to a World Government and giving up our freedoms then. :D

[who897]

I guess the answer is submitting to a World Government and giving up our freedoms then. :D

I'd like to give up other people's freedoms :D

[who897]

I'd like to give up other people's freedoms :D

Who wants to give up their personal freedoms to become my personal steward?

[MrBirdy]

well, this i9s what happens when abortion is illegal